Page 92 - NAAC-Volume-2

Basic HTML Version

School of Electrical Engineering
Page 264
2.
Ms. Anusuya
12.
Mr. Haneesh K M
3.
Mr. RajaKumar
13.
Mr. Narendran .S
4.
Mr.Tamilselvan
14.
Mr. Thomas K P
5.
Mr. Rajaram
15.
Mr. N. Sridhar
6.
Mr. T. Chandra Sekar
16.
Mr. Mohan.M
7.
Mr. Nurul Hasani
17.
Mr. Mohamed Imran A
8.
Ms. Sofana Rekha
18.
Mr. Sureshkumar Sudabattula
9.
Mr. Swaminathan
19.
Mr. Thulasidharan .S
10.
Mr. K.V.Kandaswamy
Sl. No. Name of the Research Associates/JRF
1.
Mr. S.Sathyan
2.
Mr. M. Dev Anand
3.
Ms. K. Priya
4.
Ms. C. Sailaja
40.
Number of post graduate students getting financial assistance from the university.
Name of the Programme
No. of Students
M.Tech – PED
09
M.Tech – C&A
06
41.
Was any need assessment exercise undertaken before the development of new
programme(s)? If so, highlight the methodology. - NA
42.
Does the department obtain feedback from
a.
faculty on curriculum as well as teaching-learning-evaluation? If yes, how does the
department utilize the feedback? - YES
In updating the syllabus, establishing the new laboratory, introducing the new
courses and programmes.
b.
students on staff, curriculum and teaching-learning-evaluation and how does the
department utilize the feedback?
In order to ensure consistency and quality of the courses taught, Quality Circle
Meetings are conducted class wise.
c.
alumni and employers on the programmes offered and how does the department
utilize the feedback?
Some of the important actions taken from the feedback are listed below:
Extension of laboratory timings in the late hours, for all the labs.
Increase in number of Industrial Visits.
Teaching of concepts through more practical demonstrations.
Replacement of old equipment.
Purchase of additional Software Licenses in the computer based Simulation and